[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patchy email
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: Patchy email |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 10:25:41 +0100 |
On Jan 9, 2012, at 10:18 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 08:22:50AM +0000, Graham Percival wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 10:37:51PM -0800, address@hidden wrote:
>>> *** FAILED BUILD ***
>>>
>>> nice make doc -j3 CPU_COUNT=3
>>>
>>> Previous good commit: 820c7ff5d380e8ca52057717ab3176b5e40107fd
>>>
>>> Current broken commit: 42984d05239a3c3be1ea859ba5214ce140448afc
>>
>> I'm beginning to suspect that we have a random build failure,
>> rather than an actual problem in staging right now (or even on Jan
>> 7). This is the only case where I haven't seen any info in the
>> logs.
>
> A new staging build just succeeded. It's just possible that
> Mike's fix 5e4ca89 solved it, or it could be sheer random fluke.
> This is not a happy situation.
>
My guy says random fluke - if ghostscript had caused the failure in the
previous build, there would have been the ghostscript stack trace in the log
files :(
Cheers,
MS
- Re: Patchy email, (continued)
Patchy email, lilypond . patchy . graham, 2012/01/06
Patchy email, lilypond . patchy . graham, 2012/01/06
Patchy email, lilypond . patchy . graham, 2012/01/09
Patchy email, lilypond . patchy . graham, 2012/01/09
Patchy email, lilypond . patchy . graham, 2012/01/11
Patchy email, lilypond . patchy . james, 2012/01/15
Patchy email, lilypond . patchy . james, 2012/01/15
Patchy email, lilypond . patchy . graham, 2012/01/18