[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Spelling fixes
From: |
James |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Spelling fixes |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Jan 2012 10:03:43 +0000 |
Stefan,
On 21 January 2012 07:23, Stefan Weil <address@hidden> wrote:
> Am 21.01.2012 00:10, schrieb Pavel Roskin:
>>
>> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:58:47 +0100
>> Stefan Weil<address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> tre
>>>
>>> my last two patches were sent inline (with git send-email),
>>> but I just learned that they should have been appended instead.
>>>
>>> So here are both patches again. Both fix some spelling issues.
>>
>> By the way, somebody please run codespell on the Lilypond sources:
>> http://git.profusion.mobi/cgit.cgi/lucas/codespell/
>
>
> Hi Pavel,
>
> that's what I did. I started with three patches, but as soon as
> I know that they are accepted, more will follow.
Your two patches have been opened as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2237
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2238
The code is uploaded for review and comment to
http://codereview.appspot.com/5562043
and
http://codereview.appspot.com/5561053
I 'own' these issues but if you get reqests for changes you can just
upload the changes to 'codereview' yourself (if you know how to do
that) or you can attach any corrected patches to the code.google
issues and I can re-submit them.
The process is documented here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/summary-for-experienced-developers
(start at 'reviews' in this case)
--
--
James