Re: avoiding forward declarations in stencil.hh

[David Kastrup]

"address@hidden" <address@hidden> writes:

> On Jan 30, 2012, at 2:49 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> logical impossibility
>
> This is all I needed to know - thanks!

Well, it forces
sizeof(x) <= 2*sizeof(x)
and we know sizeof(x)>= 0, so it is not logically impossible as long as
the structure does not contain anything else beside two structures of
its own kind.

But there won't be room for payload then.

Using a pointer is ok, and SCM is kind of a pointer.

-- 
David Kastrup