[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rietveld patchy: test run

From: Phil Holmes
Subject: Re: Rietveld patchy: test run
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:06:23 -0000

----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Percival" <address@hidden>
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
Cc: "Julien Rioux" <address@hidden>; "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>; "LilyPond Developers" <address@hidden>
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 8:54 PM
Subject: Re: Rietveld patchy: test run

On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 08:36:31PM -0000, Phil Holmes wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Percival"

>challenging to decide when I should nag people (or "clarify the
>situation") or not.

I thought you always erred on the side of nagging people :-)

Believe it or not, I only send approximately 30% of potential

- Graham

I'm even more worried now - that you must have a list of "potential nags" and then tick them off and can thus run the stats. :-) again.

Phil Holmes

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]