[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:58:56 +0100 |
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Graham Percival
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:57:34AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > If so, there's no problem. But I would doubt that they have such a
>> > policy -- and getting the FSF investigated due to tax evasion or
>> > something would suck. I like to be extra-cautious when it comes to
>> > money and legal affairs.
>>
>> The FSF are perfectly equipped to deal with money and legal affairs as
>> cautious as necessary. But you should not wait until the last minute
>> for checking out the details and getting them to act.
>
> Definitely.
>
>> I seem to remember that Karl Berry was somewhat involved with the GSoC
>> guidelines for the FSF: perhaps informally asking him how to proceed
>> might get you on track fastest.
>
> Good idea! Janek, please email Karl Berry, cc'd to me.
Done.
- GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question, Janek Warchoł, 2012/02/16
- Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question, Graham Percival, 2012/02/16
- Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question, David Kastrup, 2012/02/16
- Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/02/16
- Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question, Janek Warchoł, 2012/02/21
- Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question, Graham Percival, 2012/02/21
- Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question, Janek Warchoł, 2012/02/21
- Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question, Graham Percival, 2012/02/21
- Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question, David Kastrup, 2012/02/22
- Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question, Graham Percival, 2012/02/22
- Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question,
Janek Warchoł <=
Re: GSoC - continue: answer to Google's question, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/02/17