Re: for_UP_and_DOWN

[Graham Percival]

On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 06:06:41PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> >> > for (UP_and_DOWN(d))
> >> >   { ... }
> >> > for (LEFT_and_RIGHT(d))
> >> >   { ... }
> >> 
> > Not yet.  I just wanted to clarify what you were talking about,
> > since most people don't have the time to go trawling through
> > rietveld discussions.  If something is difficult to understand,
> > the first instinct is just to ignore the discussion.
> 
> Is this supposed to declare d itself or not?

... probably?


Lukasz, could we have a nice concise example of exactly what the
final suggestion is?  What's the macro?

- Graham