Re: Regtest "dynamics-broken-hairpin.ly"

[Simon Albrecht]

Am 27.08.2015 um 15:37 schrieb Phil Holmes:
> Agreed.  We had a grand regtest rating project about 3 years ago, and 
> my comment was that "I don`t see a broken crescendo.".  However, it 
> was so hard to make general improvements to the regtests that I did 
> not follow most up any further.
>
> I'm assuming you could add this as an issue, but not follow up with a 
> fix to git?
Yes. I’ve yet to follow up with that bit of knowledge…
But I’ll create an issue on bug-lilypond.

Thanks, Simon
> --
> Phil Holmes
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Albrecht" 
> <address@hidden>
> To: "ly-devel" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 2:11 PM
> Subject: Regtest "dynamics-broken-hairpin.ly"
>
>
> Hello,
>
> forgive if this should be an unnecessary question, but: does this
> regtest do what it should?
> The description says:
>
> \header{
> texidoc = "Broken crescendi should be open on one side."
> }
>
> but the code reads
>
> \relative {
>   c''1 \< \break c1\!  \> \break c1\!
> }
>
> so each hairpin actually ends before line break and there are no broken
> hairpins IIUC.
>
> It’s somewhat self-contradictory here: To match the regtest title, I’d
> use some code like
>
> \relative {
>   c''1 \< \break
>   c
>   c\> \break
>   c
>   c\!
> }
>
> (output attached)
> – but, quite correctly, the ‘inner’ broken parts are open to both sides.
>
> So, whatever this regtest was designed for, either it needs a clearer
> description or different code.
>
> Best regards, Simon
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > lilypond-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel