[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Issue #3947] fixing \huge et al.
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: [Issue #3947] fixing \huge et al. |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Jun 2017 23:37:46 +0200 |
2017-06-07 21:53 GMT+02:00 Carl Sorensen <address@hidden>:
>
> Is there any place else in the codebase where we include lilypond examples
> in the doc strings? It seems like we ought to try for consistency; either
> use lilypond examples in all of the doc strings (maybe at least for markup
> functions) or in none of them. I don't know the right answer; I'm just
> raising the question.
>From the comment on top of define-markup-commands.scm:
[...]
;;;
;;; Each markup command definition shall have a documentation string
;;; with description, syntax and example.
Cheers,
Harm