[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Any objections to branching off a stable branch for 2.20?
|
From: |
David Kastrup |
|
Subject: |
Re: Any objections to branching off a stable branch for 2.20? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jul 2017 14:48:46 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Federico Bruni <address@hidden> writes:
> Il giorno lun 17 lug 2017 alle 19:14, David Kastrup <address@hidden> ha
> scritto:
>> Other things up for cherry-picking are documentation changes and
>> their translations. Since translations usually are done in "bulk",
>> it would make sense to only translate stuff in the stable 2.20
>> branch in the interregnum: that way the translation branch can be
>> merged (rather than individual parts cherry-picked) into the stable
>> branch until the stable branch gets released.
>
> So when you create the stable/2.20 branch, Jean-Charles or Paco will
> merge that branch (instead of master) into the translation branch; and
> translators will keep working on the translation branch as usual.
>
> Is it correct?
Yes, I think this is what should make sense. I'll do so today.
--
David Kastrup