Re: Add usage of OpenType font feature to the documents (issue 328140043 by address@hidden)

[tisimst . lilypond]

On 2017/07/27 13:47:01, trueroad wrote:
> Thank you for your reviewing.


https://codereview.appspot.com/328140043/diff/1/Documentation/changes.tely
> File Documentation/changes.tely (right):


https://codereview.appspot.com/328140043/diff/1/Documentation/changes.tely#newcode1037
> Documentation/changes.tely:1037:
> On 2017/07/26 20:09:33, lemzwerg wrote:
> > It would be nice to have an example of a feature that needs an index
(e.g.,
> the
> > `salt' or `swsh' features).

> Done.


https://codereview.appspot.com/328140043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/text.itely
> File Documentation/notation/text.itely (right):


https://codereview.appspot.com/328140043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/text.itely#newcode1464
> Documentation/notation/text.itely:1464:
> On 2017/07/26 15:38:12, pkx166h wrote:
> > Would it be appropriate to add something after this @lilypond
example like:
> >
> > For the full OpenType font feature list please see:
> >
> > @uref{https://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/featurelist.htm}
> >
> > Otherwise LGTM

> Done.

This is really great! Do you happen know what the current limitations
are? Or rather, having the full feature list is great, but if only a few
features are actually recognized by the underlying typography engine
(it's still Pango, right?), that would probably be a better list to
show, unless they're all recognized, of course.

https://codereview.appspot.com/328140043/