[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Installing URW++ fonts, issue 4998: why not add wget lines to lilyd
From: |
James Lowe |
Subject: |
Re: Installing URW++ fonts, issue 4998: why not add wget lines to lilydev-setup.sh? |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Oct 2017 14:10:27 +0100 (BST) |
Federico,
On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 13:16:48 +0200, Federico Bruni <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> Il giorno gio 5 ott 2017 alle 14:01, Federico Bruni
> <address@hidden> ha scritto:
> >
> >
> > Il giorno gio 5 ott 2017 alle 3:10, Karlin High
> > <address@hidden> ha scritto:
> >> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Carl Sorensen <address@hidden>
> >> wrote:
> >>> [...]
> >>
> >>> somehow this patch needs to be coordinated with Federico,
> >>> rather than using the standard LilyPond patch sequence.
> >>
> >> That's what I gathered, too. I assumed Federico follows this list.
> >> The
> >> discussion had
> >> stopped with the question of how to instruct new developers to get
> >> the fonts,
> >> and I debated whether to continue it here,
> >> or on the Sourceforge or Rietveld issues.
> >>
> >
> > Hi Karlin
> >
> > In my opinion these fonts should be provided by linux distros.
> > I've just read that a new package urw-base35-fonts will replace the
> > obsolete urw-fonts in Fedora 27 (which should be released in
> > November):
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/urw-base35-fonts-20170801-1.fc27
> >
> > Upstream repository is:
> > https://github.com/ArtifexSoftware/urw-base35-fonts
> >
>
> I'm testing a new container based on Fedora 27, where urw-base35-fonts
> is installed.
> However, I'm still getting the configure error because it seems that
> lilypond need the .otf files and this package contains only *.t1 and
> *.afm files:
>
> # ls /usr/share/fonts/urw-base35
> C059-BdIta.afm NimbusRoman-Regular.afm
> P052-Roman.afm
> C059-BdIta.t1 NimbusRoman-Regular.t1
> P052-Roman.t1
> C059-Bold.afm NimbusSans-Bold.afm
> StandardSymbolsPS.afm
> C059-Bold.t1 NimbusSans-Bold.t1
> StandardSymbolsPS.t1
> C059-Italic.afm NimbusSans-BoldItalic.afm
> URWBookman-Demi.afm
> C059-Italic.t1 NimbusSans-BoldItalic.t1
> URWBookman-Demi.t1
> C059-Roman.afm NimbusSans-Italic.afm
> URWBookman-DemiItalic.afm
> C059-Roman.t1 NimbusSans-Italic.t1
> URWBookman-DemiItalic.t1
> D050000L.afm NimbusSans-Regular.afm
> URWBookman-Light.afm
> D050000L.t1 NimbusSans-Regular.t1
> URWBookman-Light.t1
> NimbusMonoPS-Bold.afm NimbusSansNarrow-BdOblique.afm
> URWBookman-LightItalic.afm
> NimbusMonoPS-Bold.t1 NimbusSansNarrow-BdOblique.t1
> URWBookman-LightItalic.t1
> NimbusMonoPS-BoldItalic.afm NimbusSansNarrow-Bold.afm
> URWGothic-Book.afm
> NimbusMonoPS-BoldItalic.t1 NimbusSansNarrow-Bold.t1
> URWGothic-Book.t1
> NimbusMonoPS-Italic.afm NimbusSansNarrow-Oblique.afm
> URWGothic-BookOblique.afm
> NimbusMonoPS-Italic.t1 NimbusSansNarrow-Oblique.t1
> URWGothic-BookOblique.t1
> NimbusMonoPS-Regular.afm NimbusSansNarrow-Regular.afm
> URWGothic-Demi.afm
> NimbusMonoPS-Regular.t1 NimbusSansNarrow-Regular.t1
> URWGothic-Demi.t1
> NimbusRoman-Bold.afm P052-Bold.afm
> URWGothic-DemiOblique.afm
> NimbusRoman-Bold.t1 P052-Bold.t1
> URWGothic-DemiOblique.t1
> NimbusRoman-BoldItalic.afm P052-BoldItalic.afm
> Z003-MediumItalic.afm
> NimbusRoman-BoldItalic.t1 P052-BoldItalic.t1
> Z003-MediumItalic.t1
> NimbusRoman-Italic.afm P052-Italic.afm fonts.dir
> NimbusRoman-Italic.t1 P052-Italic.t1
>
> What would you recommend to do? (question open to all the fonts guru in
> this list...)
>
> There's an open issue to document this in the CG:
> https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4998/
>
I have not been able to find anyway other than manually copying the OTF files
from their git repo.
There was a discussion started here
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2017-10/msg00019.html
Oh but I see you already replied to this in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2017-10/msg00022.html
So if this is just for LilyDev then I'd just install them manually like you
would for other dependencies by copying the files manually.
James
- Re: Installing URW++ fonts, issue 4998: why not add wget lines to lilydev-setup.sh?, (continued)
- Re: Installing URW++ fonts, issue 4998: why not add wget lines to lilydev-setup.sh?, Karlin High, 2017/10/06
- Re: Installing URW++ fonts, issue 4998: why not add wget lines to lilydev-setup.sh?, Federico Bruni, 2017/10/10
- Re: Installing URW++ fonts, issue 4998: why not add wget lines to lilydev-setup.sh?, Karlin High, 2017/10/10
- Re: Installing URW++ fonts, issue 4998: why not add wget lines to lilydev-setup.sh?, David Kastrup, 2017/10/10
- Re: Installing URW++ fonts, issue 4998: why not add wget lines to lilydev-setup.sh?, Thomas Morley, 2017/10/10
- Re: Installing URW++ fonts, issue 4998: why not add wget lines to lilydev-setup.sh?, Knut Petersen, 2017/10/10
- Re: Installing URW++ fonts, issue 4998: why not add wget lines to lilydev-setup.sh?, David Kastrup, 2017/10/10
- Re: Installing URW++ fonts, issue 4998: why not add wget lines to lilydev-setup.sh?, Thomas Morley, 2017/10/10
- Re: Installing URW++ fonts, issue 4998: why not add wget lines to lilydev-setup.sh?, Federico Bruni, 2017/10/10
- Re: Installing URW++ fonts, issue 4998: why not add wget lines to lilydev-setup.sh?, Federico Bruni, 2017/10/25
- Re: Installing URW++ fonts, issue 4998: why not add wget lines to lilydev-setup.sh?,
James Lowe <=
- Re: Installing URW++ fonts, issue 4998: why not add wget lines to lilydev-setup.sh?, Federico Bruni, 2017/10/25
- Re: Installing URW++ fonts, issue 4998: why not add wget lines to lilydev-setup.sh?, Federico Bruni, 2017/10/26