Re: Issue 5368: Reduce allocations in Grob dimension caching (issue 359770043 by address@hidden)

[nine . fierce . ballads]

On 2018/07/06 09:12:32, dak wrote:
> On 2018/07/05 21:32:25, Dan Eble wrote:
> > On 2018/07/05 12:20:27, dak wrote:
> > The rationale is that std::optional is fit for this situation and if
LilyPond
> > were built with C++17 I would simply have used it.

> Any C++17 lookalike package is _not_ "simply using it"

not what I said

> Let me remind you that your project on "use std;" was hampered by us
not having
> been able to rid ourselves yet of std-vector.hh.

I recall that isnan was the final problem before I left off trying.

> off leaving the cost of generalization for a future time when we can
just use
> the generalized solution that somebody else has to bother with keeping
in
> working order?

Expect an update.

https://codereview.appspot.com/359770043/