[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What's up with grob property "skyline-quantizing" ?
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: What's up with grob property "skyline-quantizing" ? |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Aug 2018 16:56:25 +0200 |
2018-08-02 23:02 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> It is still being used, however, even though it has become impossible to
> set it. More exactly, its hard-coded fallback value is being used.
>
> Should we stick with that and just drop the name of the property
> altogether? It does not seem like it has been missed all that much...
Regarding the recent discussion I'd vote to keep it as is for the time being.
With the following minimal reimplementation it's settable again, so
everyone interested may do experiments.
#(set-object-property! 'skyline-quantizing 'backend-type? number?)
%% after
%% /input/regression/slur-vertical-skylines.ly
\relative {
\override Slur.skyline-quantizing = 100
f'8^"rit"( c' f c' f) r8 r4 |
c2( c,2 |
g1)~\startTrillSpan
g1\stopTrillSpan
g1(\f
g,1)
}
I suggest we wait for feedback and probably reimplement it in a saner
manner with 2.21
Cheers,
Harm
- What's up with grob property "skyline-quantizing" ?, David Kastrup, 2018/08/02
- Re: What's up with grob property "skyline-quantizing" ?, Torsten Hämmerle, 2018/08/02
- Re: What's up with grob property "skyline-quantizing" ?, madMuze, 2018/08/03
- Re: What's up with grob property "skyline-quantizing" ?, David Kastrup, 2018/08/03
- Re: What's up with grob property "skyline-quantizing" ?, madMuze, 2018/08/03
- Re: What's up with grob property "skyline-quantizing" ?, David Kastrup, 2018/08/03
- Re: What's up with grob property "skyline-quantizing" ?, madMuze, 2018/08/04
- Re: What's up with grob property "skyline-quantizing" ?, David Kastrup, 2018/08/04
- Re: What's up with grob property "skyline-quantizing" ?, madMuze, 2018/08/05
Re: What's up with grob property "skyline-quantizing" ?,
Thomas Morley <=