lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gub: I can now completely build lilypond


From: Thomas Morley
Subject: Re: gub: I can now completely build lilypond
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 17:06:44 +0100

Am Mo., 7. Jan. 2019 um 08:10 Uhr schrieb Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden>:
>
>
> Folks,
>
>
> using gub pull requests
>
>   https://github.com/gperciva/gub/pull/53
>   https://github.com/gperciva/gub/pull/54
>
> together with
>
>   https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5456/
>
> allows me to successfully run gub's `make lilypond' on my machine,
> including regression tests and documentation!  This means that
> a lilypond build is no longer bound to a certain architecture, user,
> or top-level directory.  As soon as issue #5456 is in git master you
> can test this :-)
>
>
>     Werner
>
>
> PS: If you want to test this immediately, do the following.
>
> . Apply the patches from the above two pull requests to gub's git
>   repository.
> . Apply https://codereview.appspot.com/349090043 to lilypond's git.
> . Move the modified file `output-distance.py' to from lilypond's git
>   to $HOME.
> . Do `git reset --hard' in lilypond's git.
> . Apply the attached patch to gub's `lilypond.make':

Hi Werner,

because you wrote "no longer bound to a certain architecture", I gave
it a try on my 64-bit Ubuntu 18.04.
Following the above described steps (and skipping 'make bootsrap')
'make lilypond' fails with

[...]
building package: darwin-ppc::odcctools
 *** Stage: download (odcctools, darwin-ppc)
 *** Stage: untar (odcctools, darwin-ppc)
 *** Stage: patch (odcctools, darwin-ppc)
sh: 1: ./32bit: not found
error: cannot run 32 bit executable: 32bit
[...]

Not really surprising for me, or should it been working?

I'll redo testings with a 32-bit OS soon.


Thanks for all your hard work on it!!

Cheers,
  Harm



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]