Re: Please test gub

[Alexander Kobel]

Hi,

On 02.02.19 10:27, Knut Petersen wrote:
> On 01.02.19 15:06, Alexander Kobel wrote:
> > On 01.02.19 14:51, Alexander Kobel wrote:
> > > GUB-bing further down the road now...
> >
> > Hrmpf, back here sooner than I hoped.
> > Guile barfed - see the attached log.
> >
> > libtool: link: x86_64-linux-gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -o 
> > .libs/guile guile-guile.o  ./.libs/libguile.so 
> > /home/akobel/gub/gub/target/linux-64/root/usr/lib/libgmp.so -lcrypt 
> > -lm /home/akobel/gub/gub/target/linux-64/root/usr/lib/libltdl.so -ldl 
> > -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/lib -Wl,-rpath 
> > -Wl,/home/akobel/gub/gub/target/linux-64/root/usr/lib
> > /home/akobel/gub/gub/target/linux-64/root/lib64/libc.so.6: undefined 
> > reference to address@hidden'
> > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status 
>
> The argumens given are ok. As usual
>
>     mkdir -p STRACE
>     strace -v -f -ff -s 10000 -o STRACE/TP bin/gub --fresh linux-64::guile
>
> will help to identify the problem.

hm, that gives appx. 2 GB of traces, and I'm not sure which process' 
trace I should look at. Nothing segfaults, so I don't get a PID hint as 
for the previous problem.

Appx. 380 MB worth of traces contain the buzzwords out_of_memory; those 
compress to 4.6 MB, so I could send them off-list?


Cheers,
Alex

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature