[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: D7#9

From: Atte Andre Jensen
Subject: Re: D7#9
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 15:14:50 +0200 (CEST)

On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:

> address@hidden writes:
> > when I get the time, I will look at what is there and what's wrong. I also
> > think we need to have a discussion anyways about what "system"(s) we want
> I don't think we need more discussion. We've had plenty of
> discussions, and nothing conclusive seems to come out, because
> everyone has a different idea of how chords must to look. What we need
> is some solid and tweakable code.

And some clean and consequent definitions. They might reflect one persons
likings, but that's better than trying to make everybody happy with one

BTW: are you suggesting that something besides the scheme defs is broken?

peace, love & harmony

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]