[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: wishlist
From: |
David Rogers |
Subject: |
Re: wishlist |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:58:43 -0800 |
On 2004/01/30, J. Daniel Ashton wrote:
>Still, my gut says that there should be individual glyphs for these
>common markings, to make them as perfect as our noteheads and stems,
>sharps, flats, etc.
I disagree with this idea. If only a few of the most common word-like
markings get separate glyphs, then all other such markings will look
out-of-place.
If it's possible to create/modify a font in order to improve ALL
possible word-like markings, that would make sense. Otherwise better
left as is.
David
- wishlist, J. Daniel Ashton, 2004/01/30
- Re: wishlist,
David Rogers <=