lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Nested slurs, was: Percussion


From: Mats Bengtsson
Subject: Re: Nested slurs, was: Percussion
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:30:19 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

But does a nested slur always work? I am on 2.1.30.hwn1 and with a code snippet from my nocturne piece I'm typesetting
g8\( |
     f4.\trill^\markup { \finger "13" } \acciaccatura { e16-2[ f] } g8\)
if you turn the phrasing slur into a normal slur, it errors at the first g8 's slur saying that it is unterminated despite that it was marked to terminate at the last g8. There is a part where, chronologically, the top notes start a slur, the bottom notes start a slur, then both notes end together. there were 2 notes in the right hand as chords that bounce around within these slurs; phrasing slurs allowed me to do this, but I don't know that it was right to begin with.

I was more or less wrong. According to the answer from Han-Wen,
you shouldn't expect nested slurs to work at all. It seems that,
by coincidence, nested slurs do work at the moment if neither
the starting note nor the ending note of the slurs coincide
(in your example, the acciaccatura slur ends at the same note
as the other slur).

  /Mats




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]