Re: MacOS X native packaged (was Re: lilypond install mac os x)

[andrea valle]

> My feeling is that Lilypond is different that GB, and concerning the
> notation, it is superior in many ways (I'm not sure though, can anyone
> send a PDF sample to me?). If anything, it should be as expensive.

As a mac user, two cents:
1) GB is also an audio/midi editor. So, it can be compared only very 
roughly with lily.
2) If it only depends on its effective value, lily should cost very 
much and surely much more than GB, which should be freeware for me 
(with 0 downloads)... . Maybe the idea was not to have lily mac app 
free, but that it costs the minimum. This can be an effective argument 
in order to make lily widespread.

ciao

-a-