[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Notes in Key Sig
From: |
Bernard Hurley |
Subject: |
Re: Notes in Key Sig |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Apr 2005 10:13:50 +0100 |
Would there be any mileage in "contributed" scripts being distributed
with Lily. Making sure they work, are documented and compatible with the
current version is the author's responsibility, but they would be
distributed under the GPL, as is the rest of Lily. I suppose it would
mean someone would have to be responsible for what was added, and,
perhaps, removed.
/Bernard
Erik Sandberg wrote:
> Nice! I think something like this really could be useful for many users.
>
> Some questions:
> - Do you have an example input file demonstrating most features (as a
> tutorial)?
> - The copyright line is (legally) unclear. Copyright laws are pretty nasty.
> To
> be on the safe side, I'd recommend you to look at FSF's recommendations, see
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html
> (you should at least provide some kind of link to the actual license text).
>
> Otherwise there is a risk that the license is invalid.
>
> Erik
>
- Notes in Key Sig, David Raleigh Arnold, 2005/04/21
- Re: Notes in Key Sig, Erik Sandberg, 2005/04/22
- Re: Notes in Key Sig, Nicolas Sceaux, 2005/04/23
- Re: Notes in Key Sig, Bernard Hurley, 2005/04/23
- Re: Notes in Key Sig, Nicolas Sceaux, 2005/04/23
- Message not available
- Re: Solfeggio (was:)Notes in Key Sig, Bernard Hurley, 2005/04/23
- Re: Solfeggio, Nicolas Sceaux, 2005/04/24
- Re: Solfeggio, darius, 2005/04/24
- Re: Solfeggio, Nicolas Sceaux, 2005/04/24
- RE: Solfeggio, Fairchild, 2005/04/24