[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Notes in Key Sig
|
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
|
Subject: |
Re: Notes in Key Sig |
|
Date: |
Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:32:27 +0200 |
Op za, 23-04-2005 te 10:13 +0100, schreef Bernard Hurley:
> Would there be any mileage in "contributed" scripts being distributed
> with Lily. Making sure they work, are documented and compatible with the
> current version is the author's responsibility, but they would be
The definition of "distributed with Lily" is "maintained by the
developer team", so I don't think this is a good idea. It would be a
better idea to set up a central repository a la LSR, where a collection
of .ly can be maintained and indexed.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden
LilyPond Software Design - http://www.lilypond-design.com
- Notes in Key Sig, David Raleigh Arnold, 2005/04/21
- Re: Notes in Key Sig, Erik Sandberg, 2005/04/22
- Re: Notes in Key Sig, Nicolas Sceaux, 2005/04/23
- Re: Notes in Key Sig, Bernard Hurley, 2005/04/23
- Re: Notes in Key Sig, Nicolas Sceaux, 2005/04/23
- Message not available
- Re: Solfeggio (was:)Notes in Key Sig, Bernard Hurley, 2005/04/23
- Re: Solfeggio, Nicolas Sceaux, 2005/04/24
- Re: Solfeggio, darius, 2005/04/24
- Re: Solfeggio, Nicolas Sceaux, 2005/04/24
- RE: Solfeggio, Fairchild, 2005/04/24
- RE: Solfeggio, darius, 2005/04/24