|Subject:||Re: missing term in Icking glossary|
|Date:||Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:04:24 -0700|
|User-agent:||Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602)|
joe ferguson wrote:
My experience is pretty well limited the choral literature. In that genre the usual interpretation of the tenuto is one of subtle emphasis, as an indication of phrasing.IOW I don't care what you call it. I just want to be able to engrave the musical symbol. We could discuss how to interpret it for a long time but that's not really the job of the LilyPond docs.Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:I would say that this is a more universal observation. E.g. the interpretation of sfz , > and ^ also depend on the composer/era.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|