[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts
From: |
Andrzej Kopec |
Subject: |
Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:42:01 +0100 |
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> I wonder whether this should be changed too. This would mean that
>
> \clef alto
> \clef "alto"
>
> becomes
>
> \clef #"alto"
>
> or
>
> \clef #'alto
>
>
> This will simplify the syntax a bit, at the expense ease of entry.
>
> What do you think?
I agree. This is not a secret that the lily is based on guile. And some deeper
(and
unavoidable in serious typographical work) tweaking needs from user at least
minimal
knowledge (my case:) how this system works.
regs, and (of course) thanks for this really marvelous program!
/ak/ :)
- Music function arguments, (continued)
- Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts, Henrik Frisk, 2005/12/15
- Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts, Mats Bengtsson, 2005/12/15
- Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts, Nicolas Sceaux, 2005/12/15
- Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts, Karl Hammar, 2005/12/16
- Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts, Nicolas Sceaux, 2005/12/16
- Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts, Syntax, Arno Waschk, 2005/12/15
- Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts, Jonatan Liljedahl, 2005/12/13
- Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts, Mats Bengtsson, 2005/12/14
- Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts,
Andrzej Kopec <=