[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 38, Issue 17
From: |
Erik Sandberg |
Subject: |
Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 38, Issue 17 |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:45:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8.3 |
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 03.16, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> alanvw wrote:
> > PS I would like to hear from others who use Notepad++ and a comment from
> > Han.
>
> (the name's Han-Wen, not Han).
>
> it looks interesting, since it can be compiled under MinGW as well.
> However, It also looks like it might be a bit heavyweight for our
> purposes. The binaries weigh in at 600 kb.
SciTE is about as heavyweight, and has one advantage IMHO: It is portable, so
it would be possible to deliver a uniform default Lilypond experience on all
platforms.
(Notepad++ is based on SciTE, and I don't really know the difference apart
from portability, so if anyone claims that Notepad++ is a better editor, then
I will not attempt to falsify that claim)
--
Erik
- Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 38, Issue 17, (continued)
- Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 38, Issue 17, stk, 2006/01/06
- RE: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 38, Issue 17, Gordon Gilbert, 2006/01/12
- Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 38, Issue 17, stk, 2006/01/15
- RE: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 38, Issue 17, alanvw, 2006/01/16
- Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 38, Issue 17, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/01/16
- Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 38, Issue 17,
Erik Sandberg <=
- Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 38, Issue 17, Trent Johnston, 2006/01/16