[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: producing "archival" scores
From: |
Roland Goretzki |
Subject: |
Re: producing "archival" scores |
Date: |
Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:34:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Hello list, hello Tom,
You wrote:
> > . . . if convert-ly doesn't work, most of the note-entry should be
> > straightforward to reuse, leaving organization and tweaking to be done
> > (for me, that usually takes about half of the time of preparing a
> > score, so that's not so bad).
>
> [ ... ]
> I spend 80 to 90% of my time on fixing the layout. So for me,
> preservation of layout is the prime requirement as regards archiving.
>
> I wonder what the typical note-entry-time/layout-tweak-time ratio is
> amongst LilyPond users.
< 10% / > 90%
Though I've made lots of own definitions in an extra file,
for me tweaking is taking most of the time ...
Best Regards Roland
Re: producing "archival" scores, stk, 2007/04/08
Re: producing "archival" scores, Tim Reeves, 2007/04/09