Re: Measure number collision

[Graham Percival]

Joe Neeman wrote:
> On Monday 23 April 2007 05:49, Maximilian Albert wrote:
> > Reinserting the above line manually in scm/define-grobs.scm and
> > comparing it with Mats' solution yields exactly the same result for
> > staves with brackets, but for ungrouped staves it does indeed look ugly.
> >
> > Is there an easy way to make this setting only work in the former case?
> > (Hm, probably not, otherwise it would probably already be implemented;))
> > Of course, it's not a big deal to add the padding property manually to
> > each score if needed, but I think eventually lily should be able to
> > detect these cases itself.
>
> The solution for this is to use more accurate glyph outlines than bounding 
> boxes. I hope to do this at some point, but it is non-trivial.

What about giving a StaffGroup some width?  I'm thinking of your recent 
fix for #352.  I mean, if there's a StaffGroup grob then we want the bar 
numbers to be higher; if there's no StaffGroup grob then we don't want 
to move the bar numbers.

Cheers,
- Graham