Re: GDP: length/page-splitting of subsections

[Graham Percival]

fiëé visuëlle wrote:
> samples (in contrary to the PDF), and often I only need a working sample 
> of usage (the in-text samples are often too short or not on topic as I 
> understand it or too cluttered - or too simple).

Hmm.  Samples are too sort, too cluttered, or too simple.  That will be 
hard to fix.  :)

> BTW I'd like to see an forever-working URL like 
> http://lilypond.org/doc/current/Documentation/ (instead of the version; 
> should need only one symlink; maybe "current-stable" and "current-dev").

Well,
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/
gives you the current-dev.  Yes, you need to update this link whenever 
we release a new stable branch... but that only happens once or twice a 
 year.

> > My preference is for 2 -- I can't believe that users want to see 
> > articulations, dynamics, and trills on the same HTML page.  But as I 
> > said, we should probably disregard my opinion on this issue.
>
> If you rework the docs anyway, then 2 is good. Otherwise I'd prefer 1.

We're reworking the docs now.  :)   ok, one more vote for 2.

Cheers,
- Graham