lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Polyphony clarification


From: Mats Bengtsson
Subject: Re: Polyphony clarification
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:54:43 +0100
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070716)

I hope you have read the section called "Explicitly instantiating voices"
carefully a number of times ;-). Note that \voiceOne and \voiceTwo are
predefined macros that just set a number of properties, i.e. they have nothing
to do with creating new voices, per se.

The example in the manual, assumes that you yourself have defined \upper and
\lower as commands/macros/identifiers or whatever you want to call them.

  /Mats

Charles Gran wrote:
A couple of questions about polyphony:

1. In this excerpt should I use "\new Voice" twice or can I just use "\voiceTwo" the second time?
2. Could \voiceOne be assumed?
3. \upper and \lower as mentioned in 6.3.4 in the manual aren't really commands are they.

Charles


\relative c {
  \clef bass
  \key a \minor
  \time 2/2
| r2 e | r f4( d) | ees f g aes | r1 |
r2. << { \voiceOne b,8^\markup { div.} c \oneVoice }
\new Voice { \voiceTwo b8 c } >> |
<< { \voiceOne c1( e) c ~ c e \oneVoice }
\new Voice { \voiceTwo e,1( b') e, ~ e b' } >> }



--
=============================================
        Mats Bengtsson
        Signal Processing
        Signals, Sensors and Systems
        Royal Institute of Technology
        SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
        Sweden
        Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463                         
       Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
        Email: address@hidden
        WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]