|
From: | Till Rettig |
Subject: | Re: GDP: addition for Rhythms? |
Date: | Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:06:40 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) |
Mats Bengtsson schrieb:
I guess you are right. For one score I thought of using only the bar numbers of the upper system, but I gave up and notated everything conventionally, marking the different bars with accents.till wrote:Hi,I just read a bit further in the GDP and saw this example about polymetric music where each note has still the same duration, so the barlines won't beon the same vertical position. Because Lilypond can't count the barsanymore, it won't put bar numbers by default. This has to be done a similar way by removing the Bar_number_engraver from the score and putting it intothe staves.Honestly, what would the purpose be of such bar numbers? For rehearsals,such bar numbers are useless, since they're different for each part, so youwould need to rely on rehearsal marks instead.
Also, if you try to do the suggested change, you will notice that the resulting bar numbers collide with the left edge bracket/brace/bar line unless you move themYes, but this seems so be also the case with normal numbers? Or is is solved with 2.11?further to the left.
What I thought migh make sense, would be to remove the bar number engraverYes, that's true, I guess, it is just decided that nothing should be printed in case that there is no common numbering.from the Score context, but it turns out that no bar numbers are typesetanyway(probably since the bar numbering information isn't available at the Score level),so it's not necessary neither.
Greetings Till
/Mats
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |