[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought
From: |
John Mandereau |
Subject: |
Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:50:33 +0100 |
Le jeudi 24 janvier 2008 à 09:11 -0500, Kieren MacMillan a écrit :
> When I speak with musicians, I almost always say "a quarter-tone
> flat" -- I rarely (if ever) say "a half-flat" or "a quarter-flat".
> But maybe that's just me...
IMHO "quarter-flat/sharp" is non-sense and sounds ugly when speaking of
quarter-tones, and it looks like from emails in this thread that
"half-sharp" is rarely used. "quarter-tone flat/sharp" is most
meaningful and unambiguous, and it definitely closes any debate between
"quarter-flat" and "half-flat", so I vote for using it in our docs; may
I change it directly in Git?
Cheers,
John
- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought, (continued)
Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought, Trevor Bača, 2008/01/22
- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought, Graham Percival, 2008/01/22
- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought, Damian leGassick, 2008/01/22
- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought, Valentin Villenave, 2008/01/23
- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought, Trevor Bača, 2008/01/23
- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought, Graham Percival, 2008/01/23
- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought, John Mandereau, 2008/01/24
- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought, Kieren MacMillan, 2008/01/24
- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought,
John Mandereau <=
- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches vastly improved, more comments sought, Graham Percival, 2008/01/24