[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Part 2 of 2 -- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches 2008-01-26
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: Part 2 of 2 -- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches 2008-01-26 |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Feb 2008 13:38:06 +0100 |
2008/2/4, Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> Interesting! I must admit that I found nothing objectionable with
> the "which"es that Kurt suggested replacing with "that"...
> actually, in a few cases, I thought that "which" sounded better.
I often use which, because I like it much more than "that"; however, I
must do horrible sentences without knowing it, since I'm French, and
have never learned English in any other way than TV-shows and
mailinglists :)
...*Which* is why I apologize for the point *that* Kurt raised :) I am
probably the one to blame for odd formulations in snippets
descriptions etc.
Cheers,
Valentin
- Re: Part 2 of 2 -- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches 2008-01-26, Palmer, Ralph, 2008/02/04
- Re: Part 2 of 2 -- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches 2008-01-26, Graham Percival, 2008/02/04
- Re: Part 2 of 2 -- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches 2008-01-26 [OT], Kieren MacMillan, 2008/02/04
- Re: Part 2 of 2 -- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches 2008-01-26 [OT], Stan Sanderson, 2008/02/04
- Re: Part 2 of 2 -- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches 2008-01-26 [OT], Graham Percival, 2008/02/04
- RE: Part 2 of 2 -- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches 2008-01-26 [OT], Trevor Daniels, 2008/02/04
- Re: Part 2 of 2 -- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches 2008-01-26 [OT], Kieren MacMillan, 2008/02/04
- Re: Part 2 of 2 -- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches 2008-01-26 [OT], Graham Percival, 2008/02/04
- Re: Part 2 of 2 -- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches 2008-01-26 [OT], Kieren MacMillan, 2008/02/04
- Re: Part 2 of 2 -- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches 2008-01-26 [OT], Kieren MacMillan, 2008/02/04
Re: Part 2 of 2 -- Re: GDP: NR 1.1 Pitches 2008-01-26,
Valentin Villenave <=