[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Additive time signatures
From: |
Hans Aberg |
Subject: |
Re: Additive time signatures |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:22:50 +0100 |
On 29 Feb 2008, at 14:53, Rune Zedeler wrote:
I have added a snippet that sets the beam grouping automatically.
Needs loads of cleanup, but works.
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=395
Two possible extensions:
One might want (if called for) to have subbeaming, as in the what
gets when in the input code is changed to
{
\mixedMeter #'(3 2 2 3 8)
\set beatGrouping = #'(1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1)
\set subdivideBeams = ##t
\repeat unfold 10 c'8 \repeat unfold 20 c'16
}
That is, the 2s and 3s in this example may have subgrouping.
And it is common to only to use "+" as is necessary to avoid
confusing, summing the parts up. For example, the well known Eleno
Mome 13 = 4+4+2+3, and a less common 13 = 3+2+3+2+3, then the Eleno
Mome may use time signature
13
16
and the other
8 5
+
16 16
So this is a supergrouping relative to the one in \mixedMeter,
telling how the time signature should be summed up.
Hans Ã…berg
- Re: Additive time signatures, (continued)
- Re: Additive time signatures, Valentin Villenave, 2008/02/28
- Re: Additive time signatures, Kurt Kroon, 2008/02/29
- Re: Additive time signatures (was: GDP ... complex meters), Valentin Villenave, 2008/02/28
- Re: Additive time signatures, Joseph Wakeling, 2008/02/28
- Re: Additive time signatures, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/02/28
- Re: Additive time signatures, Joseph Wakeling, 2008/02/28
- Re: Additive time signatures, Hans Aberg, 2008/02/28
- Re: Additive time signatures, Joseph Wakeling, 2008/02/28
- Re: Additive time signatures, Hans Aberg, 2008/02/28
- Re: Additive time signatures, Rune Zedeler, 2008/02/29
- Re: Additive time signatures,
Hans Aberg <=
Re: GDP glossary question: complex meters, Anh Hai Trinh, 2008/02/28
Re: GDP glossary question: complex meters, Hans Aberg, 2008/02/29