[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist Notation"

From: Valentin Villenave
Subject: Re: GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist Notation"
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 16:24:10 +0200

2008/4/3, Trevor Daniels <address@hidden>:

>  The next step is to revise the second chapter in the Notation Reference -
> NR 2 "Specialist notation".  To kick off this process the new suggested
> section headings can be found at
> , and we now
> need your comments on these before we begin work on the text.  Are the names
> sensible?  Is the grouping optimal?  Are there other topics which should be
> included?

I love the new layout! I don't know who wrote it, but it is really great.

Perhaps Accordion (and not "Accordian") should go into Wind instruments?

If we decide to add "bowing indications" in Strings, we should
consider adding "Breathing indications" to Wind instruments, shouldn't

Otherwise, I really like what's been done with Vocal music; I wasn't
happy at all with the former titles. And it's really a good idea to
add more sections everywhere it's needed. In many places I think it's
really sensible and consistent.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]