[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: small addition to NR1, Arpeggios
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: small addition to NR1, Arpeggios |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:26:26 -0700 |
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 21:48:41 -0700
"Patrick McCarty" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Andrew Hawryluk <address@hidden>
> wrote:
> > In NR 1.3.3.2, could we change the second snippet to read
> > \arpeggioBracket
> > <c e g c>\arpeggio
> > \arpeggioNeutral
> > <c e g c>\arpeggio
> > to clarify the method of canceling the arpeggioBracket? (I had to
> > dig through property-init.ly to convince myself that this was the
> > correct way of doing it.)
>
> This is a good idea. Even though the \arpeggioNeutral command is seen
> in the third example, it should probably appear earlier (in the second
> example, as you suggest). I'll keep this in mind while I work on this
> section.
No, this isn't a good solution. There's no reason for
\arpeggioNetural to cancel out \arpeggioBracket as well as the
directions, especially since \*Neutral is the universal command
for cancelling directions.
Let's add \arpeggioWavy or something like that for cancelling
\arpeggioBracket. I'm not enamored of the name, though. Any
other suggestions?
Cheers,
- Graham