Re: GDP: Reorganisation of NR 2 - Final call for comments

[Till Rettig]

Trevor Daniels schrieb:
> Thanks Till
>
> Would "Ancient and modern from one source" cover it.  I can't think of 
> anything shorter.
I am fine with that one.
> Anyone else any better suggestions?
>
> Trevor
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Till Rettig" <address@hidden>
> To: "Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden>
> Cc: <address@hidden>
> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 7:32 PM
> Subject: Re: GDP: Reorganisation of NR 2 - Final call for comments
>
>
> > Trevor Daniels schrieb:
> > > Till Rettig wrote
> > > > Hi, this would be my suggestion for the ancient section:
> > > >
> > > > 8.5 Transcription of ancient music
> > > >
> > > > 5.1 using the same source for the original and the transcription [Here
> > > > among others the snippets about reducing note length]
> > > >
> > > > 5.2 Incipits and Mensurstriche-layout
> > > >
> > > > 5.3 Transcription of Gregorian chant
> > > >
> > > > 5.4 Musica ficta
> > > >
> > > > 5.4.1 Suggested accidentals (new) (2.8.4)
> > > >
> > > > Something like that, please reformulate as you like, I am really 
> > > > bad in
> > > > creating headings.
> > >
> > > Many thanks.  I've changed your suggestion slightly to:
> > >
> > > 2.8.5 Transcribing ancient music (new)
> > >        .1 using the same source for the original and the transcription
> > >            [Here among others the snippets about reducing note length]
> > >        .2 Incipits and Mensurstriche-layout (new)
> > >            (lsr and -user)
> > >        .3 Transcribing Gregorian chant (new)
> > >            (extract from 1.6.1.1)
> > >        .4 Musica ficta accidentals
> > >            (2.8.4)
> > >
> > > There aren't enough levels to go to 2.8.5.4.1 for your "Suggested 
> > > sccidentals", so I put them all at one level, as they are now in 2.8.4.
> > Sorry for replying so late, I just now read the last part of your 
> > message...
> > Yes, I just copied from your suggestion, maybe I mixed the levels. I 
> > was also wondering that there are too much levels...
> > > I don't understand what the heading to 2.8.5.1 means, so I've not 
> > > been able to come up with a better one.  Can you please explain?  
> > > Would it mean "Transcribing verbatim"?
> > Ok, I mean: You write the notes only one time, and from the same 
> > notes you can print the mensural notation (as a copy of the original 
> > score) by modifying the shapes of the notes and so on, then you would 
> > from still the same notes print also the score in modern notation 
> > (possibly the first version is not a score but only parts for each 
> > voice, the modern score then is a normal choral score).
> >
> > See http://aspodata.se/noter/palestrina/dies_sanctificatus/all.pdf 
> > for an example by Carl Hammar (here he did the parts as well as a 
> > score in mensural notation and then as the last piece the same notes 
> > as a modern score.)
> >
> > Hope you can make up a good sectioning title if this is accepted for 
> > the NR.
> >
> > Till
> > > > Till
> > > Trevor D