Re: *.mid vs *.midi

[CDon]

Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 
> Windows users seem to
> believe that .mid is more legitimate than .midi, but non-MS users are
> used to non-three-letters extensions.
> 

It is not a matter of belief but rather a matter of practicality... Many
applications that import MIDI files for post processing (for example, BIAB
or Jammer Pro) will not accept .midi as a valid extension.  Their internal
'filtering' will just not allow import.  

The use of a batch file along the lines proposed by Karl should provide a
satisfactory workaround.  Thanks Karl.

Don
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/*.mid-vs-*.midi-tp17235029p17253856.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.