Re: debian control file out of date? was: Re: live cd-with lilypondhttp://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/topdocs/INSTALL

[Francisco Vila]

2008/8/31 Reinhold Kainhofer <address@hidden>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Am Sonntag, 31. August 2008 schrieb Karl Hammar:
>> Thomas wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2008-08-30 at 22:16 +0100, Rob Canning wrote:
>> > > the debian package lilypond-data has a pre-depend of  texlive  though
>> > > lilypond  no longer has a runtime dependency on tex

>> As long as lilypond-book is included there is a dependancy on latex.

> No, there is not. lilypond-book does not need latex, it simply is able to
> process a file in latex syntax and generate output, that can then be
> processed with latex. But latex is not required for lilypond-book. It's only
> required if you want to process that file further.
>
> lilypond-book it is also able to process e.g. a docbook file and still we
> don't have a dependency on docbook.

The same I told to Valentin:

http://www.nabble.com/lilypond-book-2.11.54-windows-xp-filename-including-spaces-to18753071.html

but this is simply not true, as Karl explains.
-- 
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
http://www.paconet.org