[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SOLVED: going backwards in time

From: Neil Puttock
Subject: Re: SOLVED: going backwards in time
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:30:44 +0100

2008/9/6 Adam James Wilson <address@hidden>:
> Hi Han-Wen,
> Thanks for the reply.  The example I sent was actually a quite simplified
> version of what I'm attempting to do; there is a real possibility that in my
> actual scores I will cause the 64-bit 'long long' numbers to overflow as
> well.  As you mentioned yourself before, I think the airtight solution is to
> use rationals or arbitrary precision.

Just to let you know, the next development release will have support
for 64-bit rationals.

I imagine arbitrary precision will have to wait for the next
development cycle, since we're approaching the release of 2.12.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]