Re: define-markup-function problem

[Jonathan Kulp]

Graham Percival wrote:
> Hey, that's way more than I know about the subject.  Remember my
> rule for doc-work: "you don't need to be perfect; you just need to
> be better than nothing".

Is this in the Contributor's Guide?  I don't remember this rule ;)

>If you can't think of anything else, just
> send "Sometimes you need to delete the word `cons' and add some
> parentheses in random places".  

That is...well...awesome!  :)

Yes, do send along exact text for me to change and I'll create a patch.

Jon
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com