[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: yet another chord question

From: M Watts
Subject: Re: yet another chord question
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:38:00 +1000
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20081105)

Brett Duncan wrote:
Because c:9+ would be the chord <c e g bes dis> rather than <c e g b dis>, so it doesn't match your chord definition.

Indeed; changing to <c e g bes dis> in the OP example works.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]