Re: LilyPond, Finale and Sibelius

[Werner LEMBERG]

> As far as the exact syntax is concerned would it be possible to just
> use no character at all?
> 
> c4 2 8. 16

Aah, indeed this looks optimal!  Han-Wen?

> We would probably still want a repeat character for when '\repeat
> unfold' is too long:
> 
> c4 & & &

Following your first idea, `c4 4 4 4' would do the same.

> <c e g>4( &\f & &)

This would be `<c e g>4 4\f 4 4'.


    Werner