Re: The fastest way to typeset orchestral scores, especially when splitting the work to many workers

[David Stocker]

It'd be best to split the work amongst many workers who each typeset 
individual instruments. Then, all the parts can be collected in the 
conductor's score using \include.

See here 
<http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/user/lilypond/Including-LilyPond-files#index-_005cinclude-1> 
and here 
<http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/user/lilypond-learning/Scores-and-parts#Scores-and-parts> 
in the documentation.

Hope that helps.

David

Daryna Baikadamova wrote:
> I plan to typeset some orchestral works.  Within a movement, is it
> faster to typeset a instrument at time, or an orchestral page (i.e.
> open edit display for all instruments, so I need to 13 tabs in my
> editor) at a time?
>
> Also if I am able to split the work to a group of workers, is it a
> good idea to give each worker an instrument?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Daryna
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
>