[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new website: initial comments
From: |
Daniel Hulme |
Subject: |
Re: new website: initial comments |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:44:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 09:15:35PM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> Any comments or offers of help? At the moment, I'm looking for
> overall design issues, like "you should have a `blarg' section on
> the main menu" or "I can't find the current documentation on this
> new website".
The three colours you base the design on are good choices. Used together
they can be a bit startling, particularly when they are in big blocks
like on the "documentation" page. I think the page would better reflect
Lilypond's aesthetic superiority if you stuck to one major colour, at
least per page.
--
Sufficiently advanced humour is indistinguishable from tedium.
corollary:
Humour distinguishable from tedium is insufficiently advanced.
http://surreal.istic.org/ Moi?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- new website: initial comments, Graham Percival, 2009/06/23
- Re: new website: initial comments,
Daniel Hulme <=
- Re: new website: initial comments, Patrick McCarty, 2009/06/23
- Re: new website: initial comments, Hans Aberg, 2009/06/23
- Re: new website: initial comments, Valentin Villenave, 2009/06/24
- Re: new website: initial comments, Patrick McCarty, 2009/06/24
- Re: new website: initial comments, Hans Aberg, 2009/06/24
- Re: new website: initial comments, Patrick McCarty, 2009/06/24
- Re: new website: initial comments, Hans Aberg, 2009/06/24
- Re: new website: initial comments, Graham Percival, 2009/06/24
- Re: new website: initial comments, Ivo Bouwmans, 2009/06/24
- Re: new website: initial comments, Patrick McCarty, 2009/06/24