[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: complex time signatures: scheme help
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: complex time signatures: scheme help |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:32:39 -0700 (PDT) |
James E. Bailey wrote:
> > 3) decide if you want
> > (#:column (one num))
> > ...or just...
> > one
> > etc.
> This bit I don't understand. (#:column (one num)) would be the
> equivalent of \markup \center-column { one num }, right?
> How would I do
> \markup \center-column {\line {one + two + three} num }?
I think it's better to line it up this way instead:
\markup { \line { one + \center-column { two num } + three} }
> > 4) decide if you want to keep the #:vcenter command.
> Probably not. I'm guessing.
Well, the usual placement of "+" is on the middle line when all
the denominators are present, but if only one denominator is
there, the plus signs usually get centered between the numerators.
> > 5) somehow incorporate your new argument (three) in with the rest
> > of the arguments.
> This bit confuses me. Isn't it incorporated by adding "three"
> everywhere?
I meant specifically in this part of the code:
(#:line ((#:column (one num))
#:vcenter "+"
(#:column (two num))))
I was just spelling it out. You probably just figured it out
before reading that far.
Let me know once you get it.
- Mark
Re: complex time signatures: scheme help, Graham Percival, 2009/08/14