[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond Speed
From: |
Jonathan Wilkes |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond Speed |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:13:41 -0700 (PDT) |
It sounds like there is a wide discrepancy depending on machine/os/etc.
Does anyone have any insight into how I could decrease this time on my
winxp machine?
I feel like if I could get it down to something close to one second, it
would be a lot easier to learn Lilypond.
Also: is there a way using LilypondTool to set Lilypond to run every
time I enter a barcheck?
Thanks,
Jonathan
--- On Fri, 8/28/09, Thomas Scharkowski <address@hidden> wrote:
> From: Thomas Scharkowski <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Lilypond Speed
> To: address@hidden, "Jonathan Wilkes" <address@hidden>
> Date: Friday, August 28, 2009, 8:59 PM
> I'm sure it is a little more, but not
> much ;-)
>
> Thomas
> Intel E6750 @ 2.66Ghz, 2 GM RAM
> Windows Xp SP3, LilyPondTool
>
> --
> Processing `C:/LilyPondFiles/test/time.ly'
> Parsing...
> Interpreting music...
> Preprocessing graphical objects...
> Solving 1 page-breaking chunks...[1: 1 pages]
> Drawing systems...
> Layout output to `time.ps'...
> Converting to `./time.pdf'...
> Processing time: 0 seconds
>
>
> LilyPond ready.
>
> --
>
- Re: Lilypond Speed, (continued)
- Re: Lilypond Speed, James E. Bailey, 2009/08/28
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Kieren MacMillan, 2009/08/28
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Frank Steinmetzger, 2009/08/28
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Wilbert Berendsen, 2009/08/28
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/28
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Thomas Scharkowski, 2009/08/28
Re: Lilypond Speed, Tim Reeves, 2009/08/28
Re: Lilypond Speed, Nick Payne, 2009/08/31