[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond Speed
From: |
Frank Steinmetzger |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond Speed |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Sep 2009 02:13:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.10 |
Am Donnerstag, 3. September 2009 schrieb Tim Reeves:
> Mainly for my own curiosity, I compiled the Reubke Sonata score to check
> timing:
> WinXP SP3 32-bit, LP 2.13.3, LPT 2.12.869, on Intel C2D E9600 (2.8GHz), 2
> GB RAM
>
> 5 min 38 seconds.
>
> A bit slower than the Linux times others got.
W00t, I got only
real 5m47.699s
user 5m32.306s
sys 0m11.697s
on my linux system (C2D @ 2 GHz), but I'm still on 2.12.1, which gave me some
error messages, though the PDF was created. Perhaps 2.13 is a little
faster(?)
--
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla'
The first time you’ll get a Microsoft product that doesn’t suck
will be the day they start producing vacuum cleaners.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Michael David Crawford, 2009/09/01
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/09/01
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Michael David Crawford, 2009/09/01
- RE: Lilypond Speed, Nick Payne, 2009/09/02
- RE: Lilypond Speed, Nick Payne, 2009/09/03
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Tim McNamara, 2009/09/03
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Pierre Couderc, 2009/09/03
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2009/09/03
- Re: Lilypond Speed, Frank Steinmetzger, 2009/09/03
Re: Lilypond Speed, Jonathan Wilkes, 2009/09/03
Re: Lilypond Speed, Tim Reeves, 2009/09/04