[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Replies to the list
From: |
Jan Kohnert |
Subject: |
Re: Replies to the list |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Sep 2010 04:19:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.34-gentoo-r1; KDE/4.4.5; i686; ; ) |
David Rogers schrieb:
> * Jan Kohnert <address@hidden> [2010-08-31 06:22]:
> >David Rogers schrieb:
> >> * Michael Welsh Duggan <address@hidden> [2010-08-30 18:04]:
> >> >Tim McNamara <address@hidden> writes:
> >> >> Is there a reason that the reply-to header is not set for the mailing
> >> >> list?
> >> >
> >> >Yes, there is a reason.
> >> >
> >> >http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> >> >http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/listreplyto.txt
> >>
> >> The logic at those links is impeccable but irrelevant.
> >
> >That are mail standards since 20+ years, if a MUA doesn't get it right,
> >it's not the fault of the list. ;)
>
> True and still irrelevant.
OK, I don't like Flamewars, so I'll stop here. But one thing I have to add:
You are using Mutt, according to your headers. Mutt in fact knows list-reply,
at least according to [1]. So why not using this? That would solve all your
problems. :)
[1] http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-2.html
--
MfG Jan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: Replies to the list, (continued)
Re: Replies to the list, Michael Welsh Duggan, 2010/08/30
Re: Replies to the list, Kaz Kylheku, 2010/08/31
Re: Replies to the list, David Rogers, 2010/08/31