[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: orchestral template, please comment

From: Phil Holmes
Subject: Re: orchestral template, please comment
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:05:16 +0100

----- Original Message ----- To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>; "Graham Percival" <address@hidden>
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 9:26 PM
Subject: Re: orchestral template, please comment

On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:20:21 -0700, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 04:29:16PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
Now approved. .  This will
mean deleting snippet 713, since I've renamed this.  I always like
to check before doing that - anyone any problems with that deletion?

If the new one has exactly the same name as the previous one, and
the previous one is deleted, there shouldn't be any problem.


    At the moment, a search in the LSR that should find 719 and/or 713
brings up links to these two snippets, but with the different headers on the search results page.

My concern is that LSR search does not, at the moment, find the snippets that go with these two erroneous headers, "Adding a laissezVibrer tie to only one note of a chord" and "Schleifer articulation mark"

My sympathies for the bother.

I was aware of this, but can't do anything about it. I was going to wait a couple of days and hope it sorts itself out.

Phil Holmes

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]