[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rests in polyphonic music - 'stems down, rests up'
From: |
andersvi |
Subject: |
Re: rests in polyphonic music - 'stems down, rests up' |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Nov 2010 11:03:46 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.90 (gnu/linux) |
Keith, thanks for the pointers, and a nice solution using stemNeutral.
>>>>> "K" == Keith E OHara <address@hidden> writes:
K> It is less clear if the use of Stem 'direction to place rests, in
K> the notes-plus-rests case, was intentional.
Shouldn't the rests by default be placed where the voice goes in the
column - odds up, evens down - regardless of stem-direction?
The call to 'get_grob_direction isn't used in the notes+rest case inside
rest-collision.cc, and i guess thats why Rest 'direction doesn't apply
there. Do you think it could be plunged in while running through the
rests to give priority for any explicit directions vs. rests?
K> For Rachmaninoff's Prelude in C-sharp minor, .... You could let
K> the stems take their natural direction,
Indeed. Apart from the placement of rests leaving the defaults in place
gives very good results.
K> and since rest-collision.cc insists on asking your rests what is
K> their Stem direction, and since un-pitched rests in a stemNeutral
K> voice answer based on neutral-direction :
I hadn't noticed this clause about un-pitched rests in stemNeutral
voices. Is their behaviour vs. 'neutral-direction documented anywhere?
Thanks alot.
-anders
- Re: rests in polyphonic music - 'stems down, rests up', (continued)
Re: rests in polyphonic music - 'stems down, rests up', Keith E OHara, 2010/11/01
Re: rests in polyphonic music - 'stems down, rests up', Keith E OHara, 2010/11/02
- Re: rests in polyphonic music - 'stems down, rests up',
andersvi <=
Re: rests in polyphonic music - 'stems down, rests up', Keith E OHara, 2010/11/04