[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: horizontal beams
From: |
James Lowe |
Subject: |
RE: horizontal beams |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Jan 2011 12:53:41 +0000 |
LLj
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden On
> Behalf Of address@hidden
> Sent: 21 January 2011 12:11
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: RE: horizontal beams
>
> James Lowe <address@hidden> escribió:
>
>
> > So if you know that it does not guarantee horizontal beams then the
> > snippet is wrong and it needs to be corrected, I can only go on what I
> > am told in the documentation or the snippet repository. So there is no
> > point adding another snippet to the documentation when we have one (as
> > far as I can see) that gives you '... horizontal beams, regardless of
> > the notes they connect' already. However if it is wrong, it would be
> > better to correct this than add something new.
>
> i agree, of course! but since the main text of NR has a "selected snippet"
> showing the use of \override Beam #'damping = #+inf.0 to produce
> horizontal beams (which is appropriate, IMO), i think it should include all
> the
> necessary tweaks to always guarantee horizontal beams. that's what i meant
> in my previous mail, sorry if i didn't myself clear. and the corresponding
> snippet at the LSR, naturally.
>
That's fine, so are you saying that the current snippet using
\override Beam #'damping = #+inf.0
Is not enough as it states in the LSR to guarantee horizontal beams because we
don't want to contradict ourselves?
I don't know how the code works, but as someone who browses the LSR I would
just say that there is only one tweak needed, but you are implying there are
cases when you need more than one tweak.
That was my point.
James
- horizontal beams, ljc, 2011/01/19
- Re: horizontal beams, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2011/01/19
- Re: horizontal beams, ljc, 2011/01/19
- Re: horizontal beams, James Lowe, 2011/01/19
- Re: horizontal beams, ljc, 2011/01/20
- RE: horizontal beams, James Lowe, 2011/01/20
- RE: horizontal beams, ljc, 2011/01/21
- RE: horizontal beams,
James Lowe <=
- RE: horizontal beams, ljc, 2011/01/22
- Re: horizontal beams, James Lowe, 2011/01/22
- Re: horizontal beams, ljc, 2011/01/22
- Re: horizontal beams, James Lowe, 2011/01/22
- Re: horizontal beams, James Lowe, 2011/01/26